meta user
network profile
| bio | website | en.altlinux.org/User:Imz |
|---|---|---|
| location | Moscow, Russia | |
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 3 months |
| seen | Mar 28 at 15:35 | |
| stats | profile views | 13 |
My name is Ivan Zakharyaschev, Иван Захарьящев, imz.
|
Mar 28 |
comment |
Is there any way to get APT to install packages to my home directory? See also Non-Root Package Managers. |
|
Jan 10 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jan 10 |
comment |
Ubuntu - can non-root user run process in chroot jail? With the new possibilities of namespaces in linux, perhaps it's possible to create (unshare) a new "user" namespace, where there would be an "embedded" root user, and perform chroot then. |
|
Jan 8 |
revised |
Possible to supply two different configurations on the same physical network, so that they are selectable as 2 alternatives in NetworkManager? Clarification: the SAME physical network. |
|
Jan 8 |
comment |
Possible to supply two different configurations on the same physical network, so that they are selectable as 2 alternatives in NetworkManager? I do not want to enter the configuration on the client side. The wish is analoguous to what we can have with WiFI: there are several selectable wireless networks with their own configurations. Can we similarly supply two alternative configurations in the wired network? They would be two different routing possibilities (chosen by the owner of the connecting device): TOR and non-TOR (normal). |
|
Jan 8 |
revised |
Possible to supply two different configurations on the same physical network, so that they are selectable as 2 alternatives in NetworkManager? Written the more general and correct question. |
|
Jan 8 |
asked | Possible to supply two different configurations on the same physical network, so that they are selectable as 2 alternatives in NetworkManager? |
|
Jan 4 |
comment |
Turn on multicast packets in the wired LAN and keep them off the WiFi on ASUS WL-520gc router Re DD-WRT: so, we should use the "micro" or "micro plus" variant (< 2Mb) of the distro fo the ASUS WL-520gc. Which of the available flavors of "micro plus" then (NEWD-2, NEWD, VINT, etc.)? dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/… says NEWD is for "all newer routers using Broadcom ..5354,... chipsets"; VINTage is for older ones. dd-wrt.com/site/support/router-database says it has 5354. |
|
Jan 2 |
revised |
Turn on multicast packets in the wired LAN and keep them off the WiFi on ASUS WL-520gc router typos |
|
Jan 2 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jan 2 |
comment |
Turn on multicast packets in the wired LAN and keep them off the WiFi on ASUS WL-520gc router This seems to be impossible with the native ASUS firmware. I could try DD-WRT for this configuration (blocking multicast on WIFI), which seems to be more flexible because it has configurable ebtables etc. Perhaps Micro-plus DD-WRT, which runs on this ASUS WL-520gc router, will alow such a configuration... |
|
Jan 2 |
asked | Turn on multicast packets in the wired LAN and keep them off the WiFi on ASUS WL-520gc router |
|
Jul 29 |
revised |
Something eats all memory (I suspect memory leak on some app). How to detect what? a link for those who will wonder what "sar" is (and in which pkg to find it) |
|
Jul 29 |
comment |
Something eats all memory (I suspect memory leak on some app). How to detect what? I have been in doubt whether the "pmem" (%MEM) field in ps or top output is the right thing to look at if trying to detect a memory leak: Isn't this only the percentage of the physical memory the process currently is using? But other parts of the process's used (incl. leaked) memory may be swapped out. Perhaps "size" or "vsize" would be more appropriate for measuring the size of a process? E.g., ps -A --sort -size -o comm,size | head -n 11 or ps -A --sort -vsize -o comm,vsize | head -n 11 |
|
Jul 29 |
suggested | suggested edit on Something eats all memory (I suspect memory leak on some app). How to detect what? |
|
Mar 29 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Aug 15 |
awarded | Excavator |
|
May 21 |
revised |
Should we disable the root user? This seems to be a question also about security (because that's one of the main arguments for (non)-using sudo). |
|
May 21 |
suggested | suggested edit on Should we disable the root user? |
|
May 21 |
answered | Ubuntu - can non-root user run process in chroot jail? |
