Reputation
Next tag badge:
95/100 score
32/20 answers
Badges
5 43 92
Impact
~1.3m people reached

Mar
5
comment Apache basic auth or SSL client certificate based on the originating IP
The background on this situation gave me cancer.
Mar
5
answered Disable sendmail
Mar
3
answered How do I test my internet connection speed via a Microsoft Windows Terminal?
Mar
3
answered Know the time of the shutdowns of the server using GUI
Mar
2
answered Is it generally a bad idea to run MongoDB and ElasticSerach on the same nodes
Feb
27
comment MX or A record issues
Thanks @MichaelHampton! I learned me some RFC.
Feb
27
revised MX or A record issues
added 434 characters in body
Feb
27
comment MX or A record issues
Is there an RFC or otherwise a standard that makes this a requirement? I'm curious about my assumptions. I mean, I'm sure it does block a lot of spam, but it's still illogical and silly. Blocking one service based on another virtually unrelated service's or host's unavailability, regardless of outcome, is broken. There's no actual need to have an A record at the apex of a sending domain for mail to be receieved. There are better standards-based ways of blocking spam. It's just a silly hack that certainly works, but is still a hack... unless I'm standards deficient, which is very likely. =)
Feb
27
comment MX or A record issues
Can you explain the "required" part with regard to point #1? Is that requirement just observational and experiential, which is still valid to bring up, or are they actually RFC and standards based requirements? Not to split hairs, but #3 isn't specifically "required" but just very good practice to make sure your mail isn't rejected. AFAIK #2 is the only thing that could be said to be absolutely required.
Feb
27
revised MX or A record issues
I accidentally a few words
Feb
27
revised MX or A record issues
Tags were kinda silly. Also, cleaned up grammar and formatting a little bit while I was at it. YOU'RE WELCOME.
Feb
27
answered MX or A record issues
Feb
27
comment Need advices on iptables
Using iptables on a dedicated machine like that is a true firewall.
Feb
25
comment Moving a web server without moving the email server
@RyanGiglio Looks good, yes.
Feb
25
comment Moving a web server without moving the email server
@RyanGiglio Ah, okay. I no has confuse now. :D
Feb
25
revised Individual accounts being spammed on server, even though DNS not hosted
edited tags
Feb
25
comment Moving a web server without moving the email server
@RyanGiglio Wait, no need to change the zone files? So you're not going to move the website away from the same system that the mail server is on? I has confuse.
Feb
25
answered Moving a web server without moving the email server
Feb
25
comment Individual accounts being spammed on server, even though DNS not hosted
This question is being voted for closure because the author does not show a level of technical understanding or appropriate due diligence in researching the topic that the community judges as being a minimum barrier to participate.
Feb
25
revised Individual accounts being spammed on server, even though DNS not hosted
added 439 characters in body