3

Are they synonyms, or components of a protocol stack? Answers with proof links are welcome.

2 Answers 2

3

They're pretty much the same.

According to Wikipedia, they are the same.

According to Microsoft, CIFS is a dialect of SMB.

5
  • Thanks. It appears CIFS is a specialisation of SMB, just like RDP is a narrow specialisation of GSS/MCS stack (T.120). Is it close?
    – yrk
    Mar 1, 2012 at 14:11
  • MS-SMB puts them another way: SMB is an extention of CIFS... so where's the truth?
    – yrk
    Mar 1, 2012 at 14:18
  • 2
    The truth is most likely here :) Which is that CIFS is "based on SMB".
    – T. Fabre
    Mar 1, 2012 at 14:26
  • Or even better, here or there
    – T. Fabre
    Mar 1, 2012 at 14:34
  • seems that the path is SMB->CIFS->SMB1.0->... Thanks.
    – yrk
    Mar 1, 2012 at 14:35
5

CIFS is an implementation of SMB. For all intents and purposes they are the same thing.

1
  • from the first link it appears that SMB to CIFS is like SUN-RPC for NFS; while the second one puts them in a row. What do I miss?
    – yrk
    Mar 1, 2012 at 14:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .