3

Both ways seem possible.

What is the better approach within Linux? Better means more efficient assuming my switch doesn't know about LACP+Tagging.

Thanks!

2
  • Your switch doesn't know OR doesn't support LACP+tagging ?
    – krisFR
    Apr 29, 2015 at 21:41
  • it supports it but only within some ports. which doesnt help much. :-( Apr 29, 2015 at 22:42

1 Answer 1

2

You can do either with recent kernels, there is no appreciable difference in efficiency.

Personally I find the idea of putting a VLAN interface into a bond to be weird, if you want high availability then surely you want it for the whole physical interface then sort out VLAN tagging later, but enough people asked for it that it's a thing now.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .