1

I am using HAProxy on Ubuntu to perform some rate limiting. Here are the most important fragments from my config:

global
    stats socket /run/haproxy/admin.sock mode 660 level admin expose-fd listeners


frontend http-listener
    bind *:80 accept-proxy

    http-request track-sc1 src table st_ip_req_rate

    http-request deny deny_status 429 if { sc_http_req_rate(1) gt 100 }
    http-request deny deny_status 429 if { sc_http_err_rate(1) gt 200 }

    default_backend no-match-backend


backend st_ip_req_rate
    stick-table  type ip  size 100k  expire 24h store http_req_rate(10s),http_err_rate(24h)


backend no-match-backend
    http-request deny deny_status 503

I did not include my actual backends here but within this example my expectations would be:

  1. requests are usually answered with a status 503
  2. the 101st request within a sliding window of 10 seconds is answered with a status 429
  3. the first request after 200 requests within a sliding window of 24 hours that have been answered with a 4xx status code is answered with a status 429

I expect the sliding window to work for the sc_http_req_rate because the example this blog post also uses a rate over 10s with an expire 30s. However the requests are denied with a 429 after 100 requests. When I look into the stick table like such:

$ echo "show table st_ip_req_rate" | sudo socat unix:/run/haproxy/admin.sock -
# table: st_ip_req_rate, type: ip, size:102400, used:10
0x7f133c01b8d8: key=192.1.2.3 use=0 exp=86389546 http_req_rate(10000)=639 http_err_rate(86400000)=0
...

I can see that the http_req_rate does not decline.

Am I wrong to expect different behavior or is this a bug? I checked the link below and no known bug seemed to match at the time (25.03.2021).

$ haproxy -v
HA-Proxy version 2.2.11-1ppa1~focal 2021/03/18 - https://haproxy.org/
Status: long-term supported branch - will stop receiving fixes around Q2 2025.
Known bugs: http://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-2.2.11.html
Running on: Linux 5.4.0-67-generic #75-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 19 18:03:38 UTC 2021 x86_64

The answer from this question suggests to use table_http_req_rate for a similar problem. This would not apply here, as my request rates also don't decline if there are no requests for > 10s.

1 Answer 1

1

I've hit this as well. It seems to be regression. Switching to 2.3.X (specifically 2.3.7) resolved the issue for me. If you're running it from docker using lts-apline as I was, you'll have to switch to a different image for now.

3

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .