2

I currently have 2 dedicated servers, both running Windows Server 2003.

The first server is being used as a web server simply to handle large file uploads, averaging about 130 files per day each at around 100MB in size.

The second server is there as a backup server in case anything goes wrong with the first one.

I need some software to perform file replication. Each file that's uploaded to server 1 needs to be replicated over to the backup server, right at the time of upload.

I haven't got bucket loads of cash to spend unfortunately so I'm looking for a cheap & reliable option.

Does anyone have any ideas?

  • 1
    Robocopy is free -- so is DFS – Richard West Feb 20 '10 at 20:52
2

You can run robocopy with the monitor option. This would detect any new files on server 1 and copy them to server 2.

The Job and Monitoring Options of RoboCopy

3

Would DFS be an option?

  • 2
    If it's 2003 R2 I'd definitely go with DFS. If it's not R2 I'd go with a robocopy-based solution. I would rather trim my toenails with a turbocharged chainsaw than have to deal with the NTFRS replication engine again. – ThatGraemeGuy Feb 20 '10 at 21:10
  • 1
    Stock 2003 DFS ain't that bad either, but if it was Win2K I'd definitely join you in the queue for that chainsaw. – Maximus Minimus Feb 20 '10 at 23:45
  • I'd agree w/ mh-- RTM W2K3 NTFRS and DFS isn't horrible, though DFS-R is definitely worlds better. – Evan Anderson Feb 21 '10 at 2:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.