-1

If I have an Ethernet cable with RJ-45 connectors crimped on both ends and having no snagless boot protection, what are my options for making the cable snagless after the fact?

Sure, if the RJ-45 connectors were not yet committed to the cable, then I could buy connector boot covers and put them on the cable and then crimp the connectors. But alas, my contractor has crimped 256 cables without providing snagless solution, so now I need to work around it.

Replacing the cables entirely is not an option, as these 256 cables run in the plenum between 20 different rooms.

Re-crimping all 256 cables is also not a great option as this is a horrible amount of less than pleasant work.

The only idea I have so far is to buy the boots, cut them longitudinally with a razor knife, put them around the cable and then glue the cut. But this is also a lot of manual work, although not as bad as recrimping all the connectors. Is there any other well-known solution to this problem?

9
  • 3
    "Re-crimping all 256 cables is also not a great option as this is a horrible amount of less than pleasant work." but that is what the contractor is for, not you, right? - "These 256 cables run in the plenum between 20 different rooms." But why have RJ45 connectors on your structured cabling in the first place, rather than patch-panels with RJ-45 on one end and RJ-45 wall-outlets on the other, which can easily last a decade. And then short, flexible , easily replaced patch cables to whatever devices need to be connected?
    – HBruijn
    Commented Feb 20 at 7:23
  • 2
    why do you need snagless cables in a fixed install location?
    – Jasen
    Commented Feb 20 at 8:20
  • 1
    That's a good point, why is the solid conductor plenum cable terminated with an RJ45 connector, instead of a patch panel? Those will be flimsy and problematic.
    – Greg Askew
    Commented Feb 20 at 9:50
  • To respond to 3 comments above: cables are crimped with RJ-45 connectors because I invest into feed-through patch panels which allows me to never crimp the cable to a patch panel. This gives me configurability both on front and back sides of the patch panels and does not tie the rack to the building. Yes, it costs more, and I love paying more for a better, more configurable setup. Commented Feb 20 at 11:23
  • 1
    Yup, and that violates any standard. It's a violation of best practices, which makes your question off-topic. I am an electrician and IT guy and I've learned both jobs from trainee to certified. A patch panel always terminates a wall socket. If you want to overengineer the rack, use a good cabling idea. The newer patch panels click into place, providing a single small socket available for patching, and if needed, you can place them in any direction.
    – djdomi
    Commented Feb 20 at 18:51

1 Answer 1

0

Since nobody has provided any constructive advice aside from attacking irrelevant aspects of the problem, here is the answer that my colleague at work was able to provide: the type of product that solves exactly this problem is called snap-in RJ45 boot (sometimes called "snap on RJ45 boot").

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .