Quick question: I have a situation where I need to let multiple people on different PCs log into one server 2008 machine as administrator simultaneously over remote desktop. I have the CALs for it, it's just not set up correctly. When one user tries to log in, it boots the other out. What I need is to present to them a different session, just each as logged in as admin. Sorry for the slightly rambling post, I'm new here. Thanks!

  • That's a new one for me! I don't know the answer, but +1 for an interesting question. Feb 23, 2010 at 21:49
  • 1
    Is this box setup as a (RD Session Host/Terminal Server)?
    – Zoredache
    Feb 24, 2010 at 0:44

6 Answers 6


A single user account can have multiple sessions in Windows 2008. On the server, run tsconfig.msc to bring up the Remote Desktop Session Host Configuration. Under "Configuration for server", double-click any of the general settings. Uncheck the box next to "Restrict each user to a single session" and click OK.

  • 1
    By the way, I did this for a while and now there are always two sessions I have to choose from... not sure where I should log out from but I've disabled this again after a brief discussion.
    – icedwater
    Aug 20, 2013 at 2:28
  • 2
    @Craig, What's the equivalent of tsconfig.msc in the other Windows Servers? I can't seem to find it both on Server 2003-R2 and Server 2012-R2. Do you mean tscc.msc?
    – Pacerier
    Mar 13, 2015 at 17:07

That's by design. Give their accounts the proper permissions they need on that server and have them log on as themselves instead.

Is there any special reason for them to share an account?

If the server is set up as a real Terminal Server (ie not just using the default Administrative Remote Desktop) then the single session per user enforcement should be possible to turn off. But the additional problem of never being able to reconnect to the same session seems like an annoying prospect - so setting forced logoff after some time would be essential and so on... it's just, wrong ^^

  • 1
    They want it this way because they believe it is "the way" to do it. I work in a very small company and being just out of college means I have to bow to everyone's wishes, best practices be damned. Not ideal, but at least I have a 9 to 5. Feb 23, 2010 at 22:06
  • 2
    @Little_Johnn in this case I think you will have to tell them they are wrong, and it's not the way, because it's not going to work the way they want, although you'll prob want to phrase it better than that!
    – Sam Cogan
    Feb 23, 2010 at 22:17
  • 2
    Well that's one way of looking at it, another is that part of an administrator's job is to promote best practice and initiate change. Should be easy to tell them it's simply impossible rather than the fact that it's also stupid ^^ But check my edit Feb 23, 2010 at 22:21
  • I seem to recall in my foggy memory something about a maximum number of RDP connections on Windows Server when it was in "admin only" mode. I'm wondering if he doesn't have it "switched" to the proper mode, and so when one admin connects, the server follows its one and only imperative: kick the other admin out. :P Sounds like the RDP connection settings are not right. Feb 24, 2010 at 2:41
  • 1
    That's why I used a Citrix Metaframe dedicated NT machine back in the day. It was terribly expensive but completely flexible. And yes, I took your advice: Each user logged in as themselves. Made searching logs easier for me when there were the inevitable issues. toastytech.com/guis/remotecitrix.html
    – SDsolar
    Mar 28, 2018 at 2:42

You can do this by setting the fSingleSessionPerUser registry key: http://remotedesktoprdp.com/force-single-session-allow-multiple-sessions-per-user

  • I've tested this and it works on 2008 and 2012 Aug 27, 2013 at 19:25

Yes it is possible even on windows home or home premium it can be done both manually or with a download. I use it all the time because it saves me allot of time. Its called Concurrent RDP Patcher and can be downloaded here : http://www.raymond.cc/blog/download/?did=125

This allows more than one user to access the device with only one admin logon.

  • I do agree however in regards to the several comments in regards to accountabillity as you would not know who did what using any other means.
    Mar 20, 2013 at 18:41

While you can do as Craig Putnam suggests, I would not. Instead, create individual admin accounts on the machine for each user. This promotes accountability. Even with auditing disabled/not configured, some things can be tracked and you can at least have a chance at identifying the person/persons who mess up the server.

Can you otherwise clarify why it must be the way they want it? When you give full details, we may be able to present other ideas that can be even better than what you were initially hoping for...


If all the users are using the same username to login, I dont even see the need to spend on the CALs. I suggest you create unique accounts for all users, and activate the CALs with per user on the terminal server.

(CALs are used per user or per device basis)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.