I never really pay block size much attention but obviously there can be benefits to choosing something other than the default. I am looking for a good "best practices" paper on choosing block size. Also, when used on top of LVM is it's performance payoffs or importance negated in any way? TIA

  • This needs way more votes. Oct 26, 2011 at 15:07

1 Answer 1


Short answer:


Longer answer:

Larger block sizes reduce fragmentation, at the cost of some wasted space at the end of the block. Having said that, give the size of most hard drives these days, unless you are storing something like a mail or news spool you should use 4096 as it matches the page size (in memory) with the block size on disk.

If you are storing a mail spool, then you should look at using something like XFS which is more efficient at storing large numbers of small files.

  • 1
    As far as ext3 with LVM do I need to conern myself with the underlying physical volume extents? Do I need to coordinate between them or anything like that? Feb 28, 2010 at 8:56
  • For a single PV inside a VG probably not, if you add extra PV's to an existing VG, then you'll have to manually rebalance the data across the new volume Feb 28, 2010 at 8:58
  • +1 for mem page == sector size. really affects performance.
    – rytis
    Feb 28, 2010 at 10:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .