My web development experience has started with Fedora and RHEL but I'm transitioning to Ubuntu. In Fedora/RHEL, the default seems to be using the /var folder while Ubuntu uses /srv.

Is there any reason to use one over the other and where does the line split? (It confused me so much that until very recently, I thought /srv was /svr for server/service)

My main concern deals with two types of folders

  • default www and ftp directories
  • specific application folders like:
    1. samba shares (possibly grouped under a smb folder)
    2. web applications (should these go in www folder, or do can I do a symlink to its own directory like "___/www/wordpress" -> "/srv/wordpress")

I'm looking for best practice, industry standards, and qualitative reasons for which approach is best (or at least why its favored).


1 Answer 1


This stems from LSB which says "/var contains variable data files. This includes spool directories and files, administrative and logging data, and transient and temporary files." but says this for /srv: "/srv contains site-specific data which is served by this system."

SuSE was one of the first disto's that I used that kept webroot's in /srv - typically Debian/Ubuntu/RHEL use /var/www - but also be aware that if you install a web application using yum or apt then they will likely end up in /usr/share. Also the packaging guidelines for Fedora say that a "package, once installed and configured by a user, can use /srv as a location for data. The package simply must not do this out of the box".

On balanced reflection I would say keep to /var/www - or you can do both by making /var/www a symlink to /srv/www. I know that on oracle RDBMS systems that I build I often create /u01 /u02 etc as symlinks to /home/oracle. The reason for this is that many DBA's expect to find things in /u01 and many others expect /home/oracle. The same can be said of Sysadmins in general - some will instinctively look in /var/www and some in /srv/www while others like myself will grep the apache config for the DocumentRoot.

Hope this provides some guidance for you.

  • 10
    I usually put "served" resources under /srv, mostly for storage and backup reasons. This way served data can be in a storage pool different from system managed files such apt cache and logs, and it's easier to accomodate more space if needed.
    – gerlos
    May 16, 2016 at 22:42
  • 7
    Using the /srv partition is particularly useful when you have separate drives mounted on /var and /srv and do not want your logging to impact your IO. It is worth mentioning that Apache comes with Directory directives for /srv as well, they are just commented out.
    – Tim
    May 28, 2017 at 22:23
  • 3
    Here are some links to the documentation of the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy: For /srv tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/srv.html and for /var tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/var.html
    – ChristophK
    Jul 26, 2020 at 11:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.