5

For building apps from source like git or rails I've seen recommendations to install in both /opt or /usr/local.

From what I've read so for, the designated use for both is about the same and it amounts to merely a style issue.

Is there any practical difference? Best practices?

3

The FHS says:

A package to be installed in /opt must locate its static files in a separate /opt/ or /opt/ directory tree, where is a name that describes the software package and is the provider's LANANA registered name.

while /usr/local hold the usual /bin/, /lib, /etc, ... hierarchy

| improve this answer | |
3

I use /usr/local for stuff I put into the system, and I let third-party installers take /opt.

| improve this answer | |
1

Personally, I like to install everything I build from source in /opt, and edit my $PATH accordingly. It instils a sense of (semi-) cleanliness, and it's easier to traverse the folder structure, perform updates etc. It just comes down to personal preference; one is not necessarily better than the other (just like you said, a style issue).

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.