AFAIK VMWare utilise it's own filesystem vmfs for performance and efficiency reasons.

What will that be if I host my VMs on an Openfiler server which setup as NAS using ext3 filesystem?



Do yourself a favour - if you've got an OpenFiler box, make use of the iSCSI protocol. It's much more efficiant (especially with Jumbo Frames) and easier to maintain, and then VMWare can format the iSCSI disks with VMFS, and you get all the benefits of shared storage.

Anyway, in answer to your actual question, have a look at the following artical: http://thesantechnologist.com/?p=52 and have a look at the VMWare presentation they link to.

  • iSCSI isn't always the best answer. NFS is arguably slower, but for many applications, the convenient access to the vm disk files more than makes up for that. – xenny May 10 '10 at 9:22
  • Thanks for your answer Farseeker. Indeed, having OpenFiler as a mini SAN using iSCSi is my ultimate goal, but for now I want to setup an NAS based on NFS for backup storage. So knowing the answer to my question help planning for the next stage, if NFS doesn't drop performance significantly then I may stick to it, since I found setting up iSCSi is a bit of a pain. – user41653 May 11 '10 at 2:22

iSCSI isn't absolutely faster, and with FreeNAS I'd bet that NFS and iSCSI are equal in performance. You can also use jumbo frames for NFS.

As for ease of use, VMFS adds another layer of complexity. NFS is already a file sharing protocol and can be used for all the features that VMFS would be used for, and eliminates maybe of the limitations of iSCSI (volume size, number of guests supported etc.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.