I'm trying to recursively copy a directory / file structure from one directory to another, keeping only html files. Should be a simple case of include / exclude shouldn't it?

I just want to print out the files first. When I get that right, I'll copy them.

rsync -a --list-only -v SOURCEDIR --exclude='.*' --include='**/*.html' 

Gives me all the files.

rsync -a --list-only -v SOURCEDIR --include='**/*.html' --exclude='*' 


rsync -a --list-only -v SOURCEDIR --include='*.html' --exclude='*' 
rsync -a --list-only -v SOURCEDIR --include=*.html --exclude=*

Give me no files.

rsync -a --list-only -v SOURCEDIR --include='*.html' --exclude='*.*'

Looks like it gives me the whole directory structure and only html files. But I don't want empty directories.


On Mac OS 10.6


Have you considered using find to do your hard work?

Something along the lines of

find ./ -name "*.html" -exec rsync -R {} /target/base/directory/ \; 

will recreate the directory tree of ./ in which html files are found, and build the same under /target/base/directory


Rsync can be confusing about selective copies like this. I use the following to do the task that you're asking for:

rsync -avP \
--filter='+ */' \
--filter='+ **/*.html' \
--filter='- *' \
--prune-empty-dirs \
--delete \
/source/ \

Basically you need to include all directories in the search, then add all *.html files to the list, the exclude all other files.

The --prune-empty-dirs option is handy to use as it excludes any directory that doesn't have a *.html file.


I'm not 100% sure this is the best[0] way to do it, but you can add a very slight tweak to your last attempt and make it work. Just add the prune directories option (--prune or -m).

rsync -am --list-only -v SOURCEDIR --include='*.html' --exclude='*.*'

[0] By 'best', I mean the cleanest and most efficient way. It seems like there should be a more elegant way of expressing this, but I don't know offhand what it is.

  • You forgot to add it. Jul 1 '10 at 20:38
  • No I didn't. It's at the beginning there, 'rsync -am'. I coupled the '-m' with the '-a'. Jul 30 '10 at 20:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.