Should we automatically convert www.example.com/abc.htm to example.com/abc.htm or vice-versa on the server side? Because user may type the site address with without www. Which is better?

EDIT: I'm asking because I'm writing many rewrite rules, so sticking to one is good I guess.


2 Answers 2


there is absolutely no technical reason for adding www to your website. Its your choice to go with or without www because many popular websites with www like google, facebook. These websites redirect

http://google.com to http://www.google.com

Also there are many websites without www like twitter, stackoverflow.com. These redirect

http://www.stackoverflow.com to http://stackoverflow.com

I think you can choose to add or omit www

One important point to note that

You should have a permanent redirect rule to redirect from

http://www.twitter.com to http://twitter.com

This is because if you have show the content for both www.twitter.com and twitter.com

Your search engine ranking would be split into two halves instead of twitter.com having 1000 ranks http://www.twitter.com would have 500 Ranks and http://twitter.com would have 500 ranks this spoils the popularity of the website.

Btw Search engines would understand the redirect rule.

  • +1: for search engine ranking
    – Lars
    Sep 28, 2010 at 11:48
  • +1 for the ranking - excellent point.
    – Matt
    Sep 28, 2010 at 16:21
  • The ranking issue was a valid point (for MSN particularly) as recently as three years ago, however, you won't see this issue with major search engines any longer.
    – danlefree
    Sep 29, 2010 at 0:01

Whichever you like. In the old days, www.foo.com was preferred in order to distinguish web servers from ftp and other servers. Nowadays nobody really cares about that anymore. It's still good to accept both with and without the www prefix, though.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .