Let's say WireShark is installed on computer A. And let's say I am looking at a Youtube video on the computer B.

Can WireShark see what computer B is doing?

4 Answers 4


In general, no, Wireshark can't sense that traffic. ErikA describes why.

However... if your network supports it, the network itself can show Computer A the traffic for Computer B, and from there Wireshark can grab it. There are several ways of getting it there.

  • Same Switch, good method If both computers are on the same network switch, and the switch is managed, it is probably possible to configure it to span/mirror/monitor (the terms change with vendor) traffic for Computer B's port onto Computer A's port. That will allow Wireshark on Computer A to see the traffic.
  • Same Switch, evil method If both computers are on the same network switch, and the switch is not terribly secure, it is possible to perform what's known as a ARP Spoofing attack. Computer A issues an ARP packet telling the subnet that it is actually the gateway address, even though it isn't. Clients that accept the ARP packet rewrite their IP:MAC-Address lookup table with the bad address in it, and proceed to send all off-subnet traffic to Computer B. For this to work, Computer B then has to send it off to the real gateway. This doesn't work on all switches, and some network stacks reject this kind of thing.
  • Same Subnet, evil method If the router isn't terribly secure either, the ARP Spoofing attack will work for an entire subnet!
  • Different Subnet entirely If Computer B is on a different subnet entirely, the only way this works is if the router core support a remote monitoring solution. Again, the names vary, and the network topology has to be just right. But it is possible.

ARP Spoofing is the only way for a computer with no special network privileges to sniff another network node's traffic, and that depends on whether or not the network switch defends against that kind of action. Simply installing Wireshark is not enough, some other action needs to be taken. Otherwise, it'll only happen when the network is explicitly configured to let it happen.

  • Good explanation. It's late here and I didn't have the patience to type all that out. :)
    – EEAA
    Oct 5, 2010 at 5:43
  • And of course, sniffers can capture traffic in non-switched networks (e.g: hub).
    – jweyrich
    Oct 5, 2010 at 16:28
  • What about WiFi?
    – Pieter
    Oct 27, 2010 at 9:41
  • What about ARP flooding, thereby filling up the switches' CAM table?
    – Ryan Ries
    May 6, 2012 at 15:57

If you're on a switched network (which is highly likely), and unless computer A is serving as the default route for computer B (unlikely), then no, computer A won't be able to see packets destined for computer B.

  • 1
    Bring back the days of the 10Mb hub for promiscuous sniffing! Oct 5, 2010 at 5:27
  • Indeed! Of course SPAN normally takes care of that just fine. :)
    – EEAA
    Oct 5, 2010 at 5:40
  • The network guys at $oldJob kept a few 10Mb hubs around for easy sniffing. Worked fine for desktop problems, though perhaps not as well these days.
    – sysadmin1138
    Oct 5, 2010 at 5:47
  • @sysadmin1138: Yes, I've heard of that trick too. Only problem is, it won't really help you with Gigabit Ethernet over fiber...
    – sleske
    Oct 5, 2010 at 10:47
  • @sleske Indeed, indeed... nor did it help with the 10Mb fibre connections they had at the time.
    – sysadmin1138
    Oct 5, 2010 at 14:08

As Farseeker alluded to, you used to be able to. Ten years ago, many networks used hubs, which were like switches but dumber, in that they reflected every packet onto every port instead of figuring out where each packet needed to go and sending it only there. Before that, some networks used coaxial ethernet with a common cable (and no hub or switch) that every station broadcast on and listened to.

In both of the above situations, a machine with Ethereal (old name for Wireshark) could indeed snoop on the whole network.

Although this situation applies to very few networks these days, I mention it for context and to understand why the idea of using Wireshark to snoop on others is still in many people's heads.



If we are mentioning evil methods anyway: with some unmanaged switches overloading the CAM table can supposedly work, and is documented somewhere in tcpdump docs IIRC.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.