Probably a FAQ but I haven't found anything useful after a while of searching:

Can I set up NFS in such a way that every single error (e.g. server CPU, hard disk, hd controller, network adapter, network cable, power supply) is masked without any need for immediate intervention?

I have only answers for parts of the problem: RAID, redundant power supply, redundant network adapters

How do I address CPU failure of the NFS server so that clients fail over transparently?


You could buy a system that can tollerate a CPU failure, or you could implement more than one server. You can create an NFS failover cluster fairly easily on Linux (I'm sure Sun et all have a mechanism for this too).

A fairly well supported/common way to do it is with heartbeat, (first link I found on Google, search NFS and heartbeat) to manage the cluster and then share the storage between the servers. The important thing to do with NFS to ensure a transparent failover is to also share the NFS state information which is usually in /var/lib/nfs. You can do that by putting it on the shared storage.

edit: Also setting the fsid option to the same value on the NFS export on each server will prevent you from getting stale file handles when the cluster fails over.

| improve this answer | |

nfs 4.1 supports pNFS, which is clustered. http://www.pnfs.com/

| improve this answer | |

Nfs standard server in a active/active configuration is impossible as I know,is possible a active/passive cluster(tested using hearthbeat+nfs3). Here's a nice how to, fast and simple using Setting Up A Highly Available NFS Server | howtoforge.com

Is also possible to setup an active/active nfs4 cluster using glusterfs+haproxy+keepalived+ganesha-nfs.

| improve this answer | |

Partners of Nexenta Systems offer clustered solutions that are ideal for making for highly available NFS, while taking full advantage of ALL available features of ZFS. Typical model calls for a 2-node cluster with a shared storage unit, configured as a JBOD. NexentaStor is used to provision NFS, CIFS, etc. In your case it may just be NFS. Our clustering framework allows for a highly-available solution that might be exactly what you are looking for.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.