I am under the impression that you should use optical for 10GbE networking because of a BER (bit error rate) several orders of magnitude lower than copper.

I'm pretty sure I previously found documentation stating so, but for the life of me I just cannot find it.

I'd like to see documentation on typical BER (in general, if such a thing exists) for:

  • 10GBase-T ports (with Cat6a cabling)
  • 10GBase-CX4 ports
  • 10GBase-T SFP+ modules (Cat6a cabling)
  • Fiber SFP+ SR modules
  • DAC SFP+ modules
  • 5
    I think distance and cost requirements may factor into your decision matrix as well. – Mike Pennington Aug 3 '12 at 14:51
  • BER by itself is a meaningless metric when comparing technologies. It only has meaning when comparing the same product from different vendors. By the way: Copper SFP+ is misleading: These are eiter 10Gbase-T or Twinax (which is the same as DAC). – Tonny Aug 3 '12 at 15:03
  • Distance and cost requirements will factor into the overall decision, yes, but the purpose behind this question is to gain insight into the BER of various media. – MikeyB Aug 3 '12 at 15:37
  • BER is absolutely -not- meaningless. There is a two order of magnitude difference between twisted pair and twinax. This is why, for example, FCoE isn't supported on 10GBaseT yet. – rnxrx Aug 3 '12 at 19:36
  • Great! Can you please provide documentation? – MikeyB Aug 3 '12 at 19:47

Twinax is rated at 10^-17 at <= 10M

Fiber is generally 10^-18 or better (lot of variables here, though - especially on long haul)

Ethernet's minimum specification is 10^-12. This is where the contention comes in as far as FC goes - it may be that a TP infrastructure can support better than 10^-12 (and hopefully most do) but at 10G speeds even that much error translates to a bad packet every few minutes.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.