I have a / partition which contains /var and is too small. I have another existing partition with enough space.

Here is my df:

File system          Size. Occ. Avai. %Ful. Monté sur
/dev/sda1             5,0G  4,5G  289M  95% /
tmpfs                 242M     0  242M   0% /lib/init/rw
udev                   10M  2,7M  7,4M  27% /dev
tmpfs                 242M     0  242M   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda2              15G  406M   14G   3% /home

How can I move the /var folder from sda1 to sda2 ?


3 Answers 3


Go into single user mode, and make sure any process writing to /var is stopped. (Check with lsof -n | grep /var)

  • mkdir -p /home/var
  • rsync -va /var/. /home/var/.
  • mv /var /var.old # you can remove /var.old when you are done to reclaim the space
  • mkdir -p /var
  • mount -o bind /home/var /var
  • update your /etc/fstab to make the bind-mount permanent.


 /home/var /var        none    bind
  • Thks! How can I enter into single user mode? Will 'var' folder stay in the /home?
    – Jérémie
    Sep 19, 2012 at 16:48
  • Yes there would always be a /home/var directory if you solve the problem this way. One way you can get into single user mode by rebooting, and choosing single user mode from the Boot menu.
    – Zoredache
    Sep 19, 2012 at 16:51
  • I am not really sure if this will work fine all the time. If you are using a more recent version (wheezy) you may be OK as it has a /run filesystem. OTOH: early in the boot process files can get opened in /var before it is bind mounted.
    – cstamas
    Sep 19, 2012 at 17:09
  • 1
    @cstamas, Having /var on a separate filesystem is supported, and always has been. Having /var on a separate is even suggested as being a good thing in FHS, and the official Debian docs.
    – Zoredache
    Sep 19, 2012 at 17:37
  • Ok, I think you are right. It was just strange to me to do this with bind mounts.
    – cstamas
    Sep 19, 2012 at 18:41

You can also use:

 mkdir /home/var
 <move contents of /var to /home/var -- however you want; EX: mv /var/* /home/var>
 mv /var /var.old
 ln -s /home/var /var

This seems a lot easier than messing around with the fstab and mount stuff.

  • 1
    Not sure why anyone would have down-vote this. This would work perfectly fine. A sym-link should work fine. I just use bind mounts for other things, so I tend to think of those first.
    – Zoredache
    Sep 19, 2012 at 19:11
  • 1
    To add to this, it may not be as safe, but it does in fact work. I've recently done this on a machine prior to placing it in production. Iw ould use caution if it's a machine that's been in use or has a lot of processes running. In my case, it was a fresh server meant to run only tomcat.
    – A.J. Brown
    Aug 9, 2013 at 17:54
  • 1
    Symlinking /var works, but instead of doing so I prefer to put an entry in /etc/fstab, to remember myself on which partition/volume I put what, and why (you can add comments). This way is also more understandable to me what I have to change in configuration if I need to change something in my hardware.
    – gerlos
    Mar 4, 2014 at 9:15
  • 1
    I can't see how this would work. I want it to work, but basic things like init use /var, don't they?
    – Sue Spence
    Nov 4, 2016 at 11:40
  • I just tried this here on my arch linux, since this was also my typical approach. But it fails. The system does not boot when your var is a symlink to a mount defined in fstab (like /home here). Var has to be bind-mounted, see accepted answer. Aug 17, 2022 at 11:37

Move /var without changing into single-user mode

When I took over a new virtual server that had been provisioned for me by my employer’s hosting company, I created extra logical volumes for var and home which had been regular directories in the root partition. Since the virtual server provider didn’t provide a KVM-like interface by which I could access the server in single-user mode, the above answers were not applicable to my setup. I hope this answer is useful for others in a similar situation (I've kept the LVM details but these can be skipped as it’s not particularly relevant whether the new filesystem is created on a logical volume or a disk partition).

Create and use a new /var filesystem with LVM

Create the filesystem for the new var volume, mount it (using a temporary directory) and copy files from the current /var to the new filesystem. When copying files with rsync, use its -a, --archive option to preserve time-stamps, ownership, modes, etc. and its -X, --xattrs option to preserve the extended attributes such as the security labels used by AppArmor and SELinux.

sudo lvcreate -L 60GB -n var VolGroup00
sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/VolGroup00/var
sudo mkdir /var.new
sudo mount /dev/VolGroup00/var /var.new
sudo rsync -raX /var/ /var.new/

Update the filesystem table

Configure the new filesystem to be used as a new mount-point for /var by adding the following line to /etc/fstab. Note that 0 is used as the pass number (last field) so that the filesystem won’t be automatically checked (fsck) after a certain number of reboots (I’ve no access to log in to the server in single-user mode).

/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-var    /var    ext4  defaults  0 0

Since I can’t change into single-user mode, reboot the computer to use this new volume as /var.

Recover disk space from the root filesystem

After the machine has restarted, carry out the following steps to clean up the temporary directory and remove the old /var files from the root filesystem:

  1. Remove the temporary mount point:

    sudo rmdir /var.new
  2. Create a new mount point to create an alternative path to the files on the old /var directory on the root filesystem (it’s currently “masked” by the new /var filesystem mounted on the directory):

    sudo mkdir /old-root
    sudo mount /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-root /old-root/
    sudo rm -rf /old-root/var/*
    sudo umount /old-root/
    sudo rmdir /old-root/
  • Do you think it's safe to have VolGroup00-root mounted twice as Read-Write ? IMO it would corrupt most of commodity FSes.
    – saulius2
    Mar 17, 2022 at 8:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.