I want to give someone permission to host some simple files on my Ubuntu webserver. This is for an IRC logging bot. I'd like to give them passwordless ssh/scp/rsync/sftp access. However I want to be able to restrict what they can do, I don't want to give them a full ssh shell in otherwords. I'd also like to be able to limit the amount of disk space they can take up, so they can't use more than (say) 200MB of my disk in total.

Bonus options that aren't required but might be nice: Limit what sort of files they can upload? (Mime type maybe?) Log when they upload a file? Limit their bandwidth?

What are my options?

4 Answers 4


On Ubuntu/Debian, you can install the scponly shell to restrict them to scp/sftp only. Just install the package and change their shell to /usr/bin/scponly:

sudo aptitude install scponly
sudo usermod -s /usr/bin/scponly USERNAME

The disk space problem is likely best solved with filesystem quotas. Unfortunately I have little experience with them.

If you want to get fancier (restricting filetypes and such) you'll probably need to write your own script to validate the commands being passed from the client. The simplest script would be a shell script that performs a test similar to this one:

if [[ $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND = "scp -f *txt" ]]

That would allow downloading .txt files. Quick tests indicate the filename is not passed as part of the scp command when sending. So it may not be possible in that case.

The script would be set as the forced command for the user's key. (The ``command="blah"'' field in authorized_keys.) It can also be set as the "ForceCommand" option for a Match group in sshd_config, like so:

Match group scponly ForceCommand /usr/local/sbin/scpwrapper

Then add the users to be so restricted to the "scponly" group.

EDIT: By request, here's the script I use to enforce rsync-only access:

# Verify that rsync command appears to be a legitimate rsnapshot command.
# Requires >= bash 3.x
# Ben Beuchler
# 6/4/07

# rsync needs to be operating in "server" mode.
re_server='rsync --server'

# Match both -x and --word options
re_options=' +-{1,2}[[:alpha:]-]+'

# Match legal paths
re_paths=' +[-[:alnum:]_./]+'

# Build the full regex

echo $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND >> ssh_log

if [[ $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND =~ $r ]]
        echo "Invalid rsync command."

Use that script as a forced command (either by "command=" in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys or using a "Match" block in sshd_config as noted above) and it will reject everything except rsync commands. With a little tweaking it could be made to only accept specific rsync commands.

  • you beat me to it (got interrupted). scponly is also available in EPEL for RHEL/CentOS and in the core repo for Fedora. Jul 21, 2009 at 21:05
  • Would scponly work with rsync? Jul 21, 2009 at 22:12
  • 1
    No; but the forced command method works great for that. I'll modify my answer above to include the script I've used for that.
    – Insyte
    Jul 21, 2009 at 23:17

A possible solution is to chroot-jail them, using an ssh dummy shell.



I have seen this successfully implemented before in this context, although I haven't done it myself.


SSH provides a mechanism for creating key pairs that can be limited to a single command or set of commands. Refer to this article on linuxjournal website for a good article that goes over how to create dedicated ssh keys for use in scripts and for cron jobs for example. This can also be applied to giving a user the ability to passwordlessly access a server and run a specific command remotely.

This stackoverflow question also has some good examples of how to do the same thing that is discussed in the lj article. Specifically you're using the authorized_keys file to add keys that are allowed to access but restricting these keys my including the commands in one of the fields in the authorized_keys file.


I couldn't get the bash script to work and sanitise an rsync input properly, maybe i missed something, instead i discovered a perl program called authprogs

This does the same in a more complex way, but it goes a lot further and allows you to also harden it against IP.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.