I would like all of my organizations RPMs to have a vendor defined so we can easily see which of our RPMs are installed. Does anyone know why Fedora says:

Do not use these tags:


They give no reasoning at all.

If not using "Vendor" are there recommendations as to another method that is commonly used for this purpose?

2 Answers 2


This has to do with RPMs generally.

http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Specfile_guidelines Has good details, but....

  • Packager Best used if your RPMs are never, ever going to be repackaged by anyone.
  • Vendor Frequently auto-set by build systems (so it may be good in your case).
  • Copyright Deprecated in favor of the License tag.
  • 1
    The Fedora Packaging Guidelines state: The Vendor tag should not be used. It is set automatically by the build system. Oct 18, 2012 at 16:33
  • Thanks Michael, but currently I don't see any vendor being set. For example, if I do rpm -qi <mypackage> | grep -i vendor nothing is printed. Where as for most other packages on my system the vendor is "Fedora Project".
    – user800133
    Oct 18, 2012 at 16:55

The Packager tag discouragement is poorly worded--I think the intent would be clearer something like this: "Don't hard-code your name in the Packager field in the RPM specfile. The rpmbuild tool will fill it in from the macro, if defined." Where macro can be defined like this:

rpmbuild --define "packager $USER@$HOSTNAME" | grep -i packager

-8: packager    [email protected]

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .