Let's say I have two cookbooks, Foo and Bar. In cookbook Foo, attributes/default.rb contains the following:

default[:test] = [{:baz => 'A', :qux => 'B'}]

In cookbook B, I'd like to expand that array with another object (i.e. merge the two arrays): {:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}, ideally from within a recipe.

I tried to put the following Bar's recipe, or the attributes file:

default[:test] = [{:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}]

Expecting the two to get merged and result in:

node[:test] == [{:baz => 'A', :qux => 'B'}, {:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}]

But that is not what happens. Instead, only one of the two objects is contained in the array during a Chef-Solo run. I also tried with default.override and default.set with the same results. How can I merge the two arrays?



If you want to add individual hash elements to an array you can do it using the insertion operator << instead of the assignment operator =

In cookbook A

# Create the default attribute as an array
default[:test]=[{:baz => 'A', :qux => 'B'}]

In cookbook B

# Using array insertion on an existing array
default[:test] << {:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}

If the runlist order is not guaranteed to be A,B then you need to guard against trying to insert into an array which doesn't yet exist.

In cookbook A

default[:test] ||= []
default[:test] << {:baz => 'A', :qux => 'B'}

In cookbook B

default[:test] ||= []
default[:test] << {:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}

If you want to merge 2 arrays just use +=

# In cookbook A
default[:test]=[{:baz => 'A', :qux => 'B'}]

# In cookbook B
default[:test] += [ {:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}, {:baz => 'E', :qux => 'F'} ]

You can try using Chef's DeepMerge method from inside the second recipe like:

a = Chef::Mixin::DeepMerge.merge(node[:test], [ (new array here) ])

a will contain the deep-merged hashes!

  • That doesn't seem to work when I want to set node[:test] to the deeply merged array. Here's the exact code I'm running: Cookbook1/attributes/default.rb: default[:test] = [{:baz => 'A', :qux => 'B'}] Cookbook2/recipes/default.rb: a = Chef::Mixin::DeepMerge.merge(node[:test], [{:baz => 'C', :qux => 'D'}]) followed by node.override[:test] = a This however results in node[:test] being empty.
    – Joseph S.
    Mar 5 '13 at 8:34
  • I proposed an edit to change from merge to deep_merge. If there are conflicts the value in the first "source" hash will win.
    – KCD
    Apr 9 '15 at 2:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.