2

I manage some 15-20 Ubuntu servers and am faced with the tedious task of keeping them all up to date.

I have looked for a simpler solution and came across Ubuntu Landscape, but this is waaaay out of our budgettary league. So i decided to build something of my own (*), which i'm fairly happy about. It's not as rock solid as an open-source project or commercial product, but it gets the job done nicely.

Still, i have this nagging feeling that my problem must have been solved by someone. However, googling for either webbased of aptitude/apt-get (let alone "webbased aptitude") yields far too many mishits. I doubt i'll ever find it using any of the terms i can come up with :-)

So, does anyone know of a solution to manage packages on multiple servers through a webbased interface.

*) The system i've built sends its update candidates to a central server where they are stored in a database. The webinterface allows one to view/check the updates per server, which are then read on the next run prior to resending the newest updatable packages (read data -> install -> check updates -> send data)

Update: I am not looking for configuration management. The whole point of manually applying updates is that you can test these updates first on a development environment. Since some packages are updated quite frequently, chaning you puppet config to reflect these versions is tedious at best.

  • Would you care to elaborate instead of just saying it ain't so? What kind of "configuration management system" are you referring to? Does it have the ability to postpone, say, a mysql upgrade since that involves a different kind of downtime. – Michiel Jun 5 '13 at 19:36
  • 1
    I'm already using puppet, but that was not my question. I'm not looking for a completely automated system! This system needs user interference. It cannot go and blindly install updates just because they are there. – Michiel Jun 5 '13 at 19:41
  • 1
    the whole point of config management is to blindly apply all of the patches you've chosen to apply to the applicable systems. I've not heard of a non- interactive patch/package management strategy – Jim B Jun 5 '13 at 21:07
  • Apologies for posting this as an answer but I don't have enough reputation to post as a comment. Michiel, what did you end up using and did you ever manage to open-source your code as this is exactly what I'm after for my little home network? If you weren't able to open-source it, any pointers in the right direction for how you implemented it? – Wayne Haffenden Sep 10 '15 at 15:22
  • 1
    @WayneHaffenden Please don't abuse the reputation system. I've converted your post into a comment this time, but in the future if you want to post a comment, please to the modicum of work required to gain the required rep points. – EEAA Sep 10 '15 at 15:54
0

I'm on the same boat you are, looking for a nice centralized way to manage updates. Up to know we used RHEL, so we leveraged the RHN web system to keep track of updates. Now I am migrating most servers to Ubuntu 14.04 and was looking for something that provided at least some management capabilities.

I am probably going to be trying this one soon: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/

It is a open source version os the RHEL system, but I have seen places that claim Ubuntu can be supported? At least it handles the kickstart files so that will be nice for quick deployments.

  • Thanks for your contibution. I personally don't use kickstarts since i'm using Puppet, but i can see where this system could be very handy. I must say that my system performs pretty well, so if anybody is interested i might convince my boss to open-source it :-) – Michiel Jul 21 '14 at 10:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.