13

Varnish is being used in a Wordpress website.

I would like to purge Varnish for a single URL instead of a whole domain.

With this command I can restart Varnish for the whole domain:

varnishadm -T :6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret 'ban req.http.host ~ \"http://www.foo.com\" && req.url ~ \"^/\"'

However I would like to purge varnish only for a single url.

Ex: www.foo.com/url_to_be_purged

I've tried the previous command replacing it with the single URL:

varnishadm -T :6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret 'ban req.http.host ~ \"http://www.foo.com/url_to_be_purged\" && req.url ~ \"^/\"'

But it didn't work, the URL still was a HIT in Varnish.

Any ideas of how can I achieve this?

UPDATE

As suggested ghloogh's answer, I've tried the following command:

varnishadm -T :6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret ban "req.http.host == http://www.foo.com && req.url == http://www.foo.com/url_to_be_purged"

I've also tried this variation:

varnishadm -T :6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret ban "req.http.host == http://www.foo.com && req.url == /url_to_be_purged"

But I still get a HIT in the URL and the data is not updated

2
  • 1
    man, stop using scheme (http:// or https:// or ftp:// or other) in hostname :) your command should be: varnishadm -T :6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret ban "req.http.host == www.foo.com && req.url == /url_to_be_purged"
    – ghloogh
    Jul 11 '13 at 15:42
  • How can we purge URL by pattern, say all matches for /foo/bar/ab*
    – anup
    Jun 11 at 6:58
20

You don't need to specify scheme for hostname and you may use strict match instead of regex:

varnishadm -T 127.0.0.1:6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret ban "req.http.host == example.com && req.url == /some/url/"
1
  • 1
    The other answer had the quote in the wrong place. > varnishadm -T 127.0.0.1:6082 -S /etc/varnish/secret "ban req.url == /url_to_be_purged"
    – Jim Holmes
    Oct 21 '16 at 12:00
1

You can try the following:

sudo varnishadm -S /etc/varnish/secret  -T 127.0.0.1:6082 "ban req.url ~ \"http://example.com/testimage.png$\""

worked for me.

2
  • 2
    This doesn't add anything but sudo to the other answer. This might be better as a comment. Jun 26 '17 at 12:52
  • you saved my day! To solve it is necessary to consider the slashes before the quotes May 12 '20 at 8:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.