I have a server with ubuntu. I do work on it over SSH. I had a problem with brute force attempts over port 22. I changed the port and I assumed it fixed the brute force problem. Am I right or are the attempts on another port just not logged anymore in /var/log/auth.log?
To avoid bruteforce attacks here is what i do:
- Change ssh port
- Install denyhosts
- Limit number of connections per second on ssh port
- Use only keybased no root ssh, instead use sashroot if needed, or console login
- port knocking to open ssh port in some case
- create a canssh group, add the people whom i wanna give ssh to this, add "AllowGroups canssh" to sshd_config. And set DENY_THRESHOLD_(IN)VALID*/ROOT in denyhosts to 1 e.g. one wrong ssh as root or (in)valid user, and your ip is blocked, add my ips to hosts.allow, create ~/.ssh/config and define which ssh-key to use for which server and create aliases say:
- alias ssyc = 'ssh firstname.lastname@example.org -i yahoo-com.identity.rsa'
- Use logwatch to email you important logs...
And as mentioned earlier, in case of bot attacks, they try 22 by default, so i guess you aren't being targeted any more.
No, all attempts will be logged to
/var/log/auth.log regardless of the port that
sshd is listening on.
The attempts are probably just generated by bots trying to get easy access. Unless someone is specifically targeting your system, they won't even look on a different port.
Security by obscurity.
As long as you didn't change anything but the port number, the logging won't be affected.
No automated attack is going to try other ports, as there are plenty of SSH servers on 22 to try.
As long as all you are relying on the port migration to do is reduce the log spam, then that's fine, but you shouldn't rely on it for any real security.
I've done the same thing to provide the same benefit of preventing the log entries.
For added hilarity (and if you have some time to kill), implement Port Knocking:
As pointed out by others changing the port will stop the annoying log spam and extra traffic, but is not a security measure as obscurity does not equal security.
A good idea might be to audit the passwords on your system with a password cracker, and/or set new passwords using a methodology like the one described here by Redhat's documentation: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/en-US/Security_Guide/s1-wstation-pass.html
Your logging shouldn't be different because of a port change.
You may also want to look at setting up denyhosts or fail2ban.
Take a look at here - 20 OpenSSH best security tips: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-unix-bsd-openssh-server-best-practices.html
You can rate-limit brute force attak with iptables:
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 3 --rttl --name SSH --rsource -j LOG --log-prefix "ATTACK SSH BRUTE FORCE "
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -m recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 3 --rttl --name SSH --rsource -j DROP
sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -m recent --set --name SSH --rsource -j ACCEPT
If you must have the login connection, you may also limit the allowed users to connect by editing /etc/pam.d/ssh and add the line :
auth required pam_listfile.so item=user sense=allow file=/etc/sshusers_allowed onerr=fail
Create a file /etc/sshusers_allowed and put all allowed users line by line.
Maybe a ssh restart, not sure.