What's the meaning of defining "burst" with "nodelay" option?

Question

In the Nginx configuration, when you want to limit the request processing rate by using the limit_req_zone / limit_req instructions, I don't really understand the use of the nodelay option.
In my understanding, it terminates the requests above the defined rate without delaying them. So it seems equivalent to burst=0. That is why I don't understand the following example :

limit_req zone=one burst=5 nodelay;

burst defines the number of requests which could be delayed, so what is the meaning to define burst if there is the nodelay option?

Answer 1

I find limit_req documentation clear enough.

burst is documented that way:

Excessive requests are delayed until their number exceeds the maximum burst size [...]

nodelay is documented that way:

If delaying of excessive requests while requests are being limited is not desired, the parameter nodelay should be used

Requests are limited to fit the defined rate. If requests are incoming at a higher rate, no more than the defined number of requests per time unit will be served. You then need to decide on what to do with those other requests.

• By default (no burst, no nodelay), requests are denied with an HTTP 503 error.
• With burst, you stack the defined number of requests in a waiting queue, but you do not process them quicker than the defined requests per time unit rate.
• With burst and nodelay, the queue won't be waiting and request bursts will get processed immediately.

Answer 2

The comments on the original answer seem wrong.

The question at hand is what the difference between, say rate=6r/s burst=0 and rate=1r/s burst=5 nodelay

The answers are great about explaining the difference when the nodelay option is NOT present -- in which case, the requests queue up with the burst, and are 503'd without the burst.

The original answer seems spot on -- with nodelay, the burst requests get processed immediately. And thererfore, the only implication of that is that there is NO difference between specifying a burst + nodelay vs. just specifying a the higher limit with busrt=0 in the first place.

Therefore, to more succinctly answer the OP question: the meaning of burst when nodelay is specified is the same as just specifying a larger rate without burst.

Answer 3

With burst and nodelay specified I find it easier to understand the mechanism like this (the other way around than it is usually understood):

1. You allow a maximum of burst requests. With $binary_remote_addr that's the maximum number of requests that you accept from a given address. Every request increases an internal counter. When the counter reaches burst all additional requests are denied (and the counter is not increased beyond burst value).
2. This counter is continuously decreased at a rate specified using rate.

This logic suggests that it makes perfect sense to specify a high burst value (e.g. 100 and more) and a low rate value (even something like 2r/s). This handles normal browsing (a batch of parallel requests followed by a quiet period) better while protecting against sustained bot request stream.

Answer 4

I asked Nicolas's question to the guy who wrote the below post in nginx website. NGINX Rate limiting.His reply is as below

In the former rate limit, nginx will accept consecutive requests at 1/6th seconds intervals. it will not accept a burst of requests that do not satisfy that minimum time interval. On the other hand in the latter definition, nginx will accept a burst of up to 6 requests regardless of the time interval between requests. Answer link

Answer 5

Based on the excellent Dan's answer and on the source code of nginx, a concise summary for the nodelay behavior seems to be the following:

• burst is how many new concurrent requests are allowed.
• rate is how many new concurrent requests become old per unit of time. (This updating happens gradually: once per request but not per second.)

Answer 6

I'm suggesting to read this thread: limit_req_zone limit by location/proxy

and this answer: stackoverflow