3

I have Cisco RV110W Wireless router. WAN port was burned after a storm. Can I use one of LAN ports as WAN?

Looking under "Switch Settings" I can't find solution. In the Cisco documentation, I could not find a solution either.

closed as off-topic by user9517 supports GoFundMonica, mdpc, Ward, MadHatter supports Monica, Wesley Oct 28 '14 at 19:24

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions must be relevant to professional system administration. Server Fault is dedicated to professional system and network administrators. End user and enthusiast questions are off-topic (contact your system administrator or hire a professional to help you out). Please see the Help Center for more information." – user9517 supports GoFundMonica, mdpc, Ward, MadHatter supports Monica, Wesley
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    It may no longer work as a router. But it might still work as an access point. Many wireless routers can be used as access point if you simply disable the DHCP server and then leave the WAN port disconnected. – kasperd Oct 22 '14 at 16:27
  • (put scotch tape over the WAN port) – ewwhite Oct 22 '14 at 17:29
9

Nope.

The Cisco RV110W device you have contains a dedicated WAN port. This is a physical hardware port intended for this purpose. You will not be able to reassign WAN functions to one of the four switch ports.

enter image description here

More importantly, equipment damaged in an electrical storm really should not be trusted. You're going to have to replace this router.

  • I never type quick enough lol...but your answer has a picture...so +1 :) – TheCleaner Oct 22 '14 at 15:39
  • 1
    Just to illustrate the separation... Versus something like a Cisco ASA 5505, whose ports can be reconfigured. – ewwhite Oct 22 '14 at 15:40
  • And +1 from me for linking to our canonical lightning-strike-mitigation question - smoooothly done! – MadHatter supports Monica Oct 22 '14 at 15:42
  • I guess, too bad( Thx for reply – Kostiuk Aleksandr Oct 22 '14 at 15:43
  • 1
    Well, technically, all five ports are on a single switch, and it has the WAN port on a separate VLAN (VLAN 1, untagged), which is why it's reserved. And of course the firmware does not let you reassign the port to another VLAN. Third party firmware might allow it though. – Michael Hampton Oct 23 '14 at 2:29
2

I believe DD-WRT will this, e.g. to set up the other LAN ports under separate, NATted subnets, and other neat tricks. DD-WRT is a complete firmware replacement, that installs a very small version of Linux, and the tools necessary to manage it. You can find it at dd-wrt.org, with probably a better explanation, instructions, and so forth.

dd-wrt is probably a 4 out of 5 on a technical scale to get installed, but if you find this intriguing, i might be worth it at least to try since it's not a router otherwise.

this forum indicates the hardware is the same is a Cisco E2000, so that image is known to work:

http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=141699&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15&sid=8056260fc95a2b055afde005b32eee7d

01/06/15 edited for grammar/clarity

  • 1
    I wouldn't recommend doing this in a professional environment... but it's a good idea for home use/small offices. – user186340 Oct 22 '14 at 23:06
  • 1
    I'd much sooner use OpenWrt, as DD-WRT's future is questionable, but the general advice is sound. – Michael Hampton Oct 23 '14 at 2:25
  • good idea, i try this, thx – Kostiuk Aleksandr Oct 23 '14 at 9:01

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.