I mean what is better to have

  • www.my-domain.de/start.html
  • www.my-domain.com/start.html


  • www.my-domain.com/de/start.html
  • www.my-domain.com/en/start.html

I'm mostly concerned with SEO here (i read the FAQ to know that SEO administration is considered on-topic). For me the two domain solution seems to be better, but most frameworks seem to prefer the use of only one domain. I found that hacking around it does not making the code more difficult. So technically there i have no preferences.

2 Answers 2


Your second variant has the best SEO properties. It keeps all pagerank on a single site, and limits the risk of accidentally creating duplicate URLs for the same content.

To me, the question really is, do you have subsidiary companies / agents / sub-communities in each country that are 'large & distinct enough' to need their own site? A qualifying need could be anything from:

  • wanting a local domain for email addresses
  • a site where content is updated on a different schedule from the parent site
  • just needing a local site for a local community to feel independent

If you don't have such an organizational / cultural need for separate sites, then my general recommendation would be your second variant, with an automatic server-side re-direct to the most likely language of the user. And of course a visible language override on the HTML page, so that the user can correct errors in the auto-detect.

Language selection can be an art in itself. The old-fashioned method is a splash page where the user selects the language himself. It works, but it's kind of ugly.

Next up is a server-side 302 / 303 redirect based on the browsers accept-language header. It kind of works -- but some browsers are misconfigured, f.x. corporate workstations are set for the corporate language of English and not the local language.

Last up is a server-side redirect based on the IP address of the request, matched against a geo-location database like the one from Maxmind. Again, this kind of works, but I know from experience that it's not perfect -- I'm from Denmark, but my ISP buys his peering in Sweden, so I often get Swedish text. :-O And it's worse when I'm traveling...

The server-side language selection based on IP address seems to be the most common now, at least it is what Google, Skype and many others do.

One last thing, I have noted that Mozilla and some others have begun using a locale code like "en-US" instead of a language code like "en" or "eng". This could be a shortlived fashion trend, or it could be lasting -- to me, it really sets an expectation of the content being fully localized and not just translated.


either are good as long as a user can "predict" localization used on the page. I'm not a seo expert, but i guess that the second case delivers better seo weight for my-domain.com.

  • Yes thats what my naive thinking is telling me too. For some reasons i think that the de/com top level domain make my website half important. Otherwise i heared somewhere that google measures every single page on it's own.
    – Lothar
    Sep 12, 2009 at 15:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.