3

So I'm getting 403: Forbidden errors on one of my apache2.4 virtualhosts.

What's interesting, is that /var/log/apache2/error.log reports:

authz_core:error] [pid 4878:tid 140394394269440] [client 10.214.154.19:33009] AH01630: client denied by server configuration

And.... While I do have other Virtualhosts which use authz (for subversion hosting primarily) I disabled all of them except the one I'm having issues with, restarted Apache, and there is no discernible difference.

Here is my Apache2 sites-available file which, even though I have disabled all other host configs, and stripped my config down to a minimum, is still denying access.

<VirtualHost *:443>

  WSGIScriptAlias /example /data/example/example.wsgi

  <Directory /data/example>
    WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}
    Order deny,allow
    Allow from all
    Require all granted
  </Directory>

  LogLevel info

  SSLEngine on
  SSLCertificateFile    /etc/ssl/certs/example.pem
  SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/example.key

</VirtualHost>

Furthermore, just to verify It's not my wsgi script, I replaced the script with:

def application(environ, start_response):
        start_response('200 OK',[('Content-type','text/html')])
        return ['<html><body>Hello World!</body></html>']

And that doesn't make any discernible difference.

Any ideas?

1 Answer 1

7

As indicated in Apache "Client denied by server configuration", despite allowing access to directory (vhost configuration) the issue is that Apache 2.4 has changed the way authorization configuration is done. The authz_core module is actually built-in, which seems to be a source of confusion.

If you simply remove the Order and Allow lines, things should work as expected. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html for details.

1
  • 1
    Thank you. For anyone in the future: Remember to pay attention to the ordering of your Aliases and VirtualHosts. I had actually tried over a dozen different authentication setups, but I had a second issue that was preventing me from realizing that this would have fixed this particular issue.
    – 1n5aN1aC
    Jan 22, 2015 at 20:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.