5

Currently I have two independent servers running Hyper-V. I`m looking for ways to add more redundancy and bought a third server that equals the capacity of server 1 and 2.

I would like the third server to be the failover node. In case server 1 , 2 or both go down, I want it to resume the VM on server 3.

I dug into Storage Spaces Direct (S2D) and Nutanix, but can not find relevant information regarding my desired setup.

Is it even possible? If so, I would like to have some pointers please :)

  • 1
    It is possible, it is what S2D does. Which is Windows Server 2016. Not even in beta. – TomTom Mar 21 '16 at 17:16
  • 3
    From what Microsoft publishes S2D needs at least FOUR servers and cannot use only three. This may change in future as nothing is in stone but not yet. – BaronSamedi1958 Mar 24 '16 at 23:48
  • 5
    There is no need for 3rd server if you would stick with some virtual SAN solution. You can build 2 node HA cluster with StarWind Virtual SAN or HP VSA for example. BTW StarWind performs great with Storage Spaces from what I have tested personally. StarWind: starwindsoftware.com/download-starwind-products HP VSA: www8.hp.com/us/en/products/storage-software/… – Strepsils Mar 28 '16 at 10:26
  • 4
    HP VSA needs an additional quorum and is limited by 50TB, furthermore their new licensing sucks (time-bombing customers). Starwind is perpetual which is awesome. – Net Runner Mar 28 '16 at 12:50
6

Read above and in another thread bumped around this one.

So we got these options now [UPDATED]:

1) Storage Spaces Direct. Datacenter-only, can't be used with a free Hyper-V Server.

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server-docs/storage/storage-spaces/storage-spaces-direct-overview

2) StarWind Virtual SAN. Has unlimited free version being OK for production you can use with Hyper-V Server.

https://www.starwindsoftware.com/starwind-virtual-san

3) HPE VSA. Has 1TB free version, time-bombed, OK for production use.

https://www.hpe.com/emea_europe/en/storage/storevirtual.html

Nutanix isn't really an option because their community edition (CE) is KVM bound, you can't use it with either Hyper-V or VMware hypervisors.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.