2

We want to stress test our pfsense box with a massive amount of connections and traffic. Right now we are using iperf, but reaching a number of more than ~300 parallel connections the test clients reach their limit regarding open tcp connections. But we need to simulate ~4000 clients running at least one TCP connection per client. What would be the best practice?

4
  • What kind of traffic ? HTTP/HTTPS ? May 3, 2016 at 13:43
  • All kinds of traffic. HTTP, HTTPS, Videostreaming via UDP, etc. Best would be variable packet sizes.
    – Juke
    May 3, 2016 at 13:45
  • 1
    For typical HTTP/HTTPS traffics I would use jMeter, I don't know any iperf alternatives unfortunately :(, maybe some scripting using nmap would be useful ? May 3, 2016 at 13:54
  • Yes, scripting could be a solution for some random connection types. I will have a look a jMeter. Otherwise I'll stick with iperf and add some clients to the test network.
    – Juke
    May 3, 2016 at 13:57

1 Answer 1

1

I don't think iperf is be flexible enough to simulate user activity for various traffic types. Depending on how you're using pfsense (routing, gateway, proxy, whatever) it will experience different load types.

So I would rather stick to one of the following tools:

  • Apache JMeter - this one have GUI and doesn't require programming skills
  • Grinder - this guy has TCP proxy for recording tests
  • Gatling - this has quite pleasant Scala-based DSL so it's easy to create and read the tests
  • Tsung - known for ability to create more load on less powerful hardware

See Open Source Load Testing Tools: Which One Should You Use? for more information on the tools.

1
  • I vote for IxChariot from Ixia Communications Jul 17, 2016 at 23:00

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.