0

This is a a question about a private network.

I have two servers (Linux), srv1, srv2, each has one NIC. I have two switches (Cisco 3750), sw1, sw2

The servers are on two different subnets.

srv1 is on 192.168.1.0 (network A, sw1) .> the A and B are not classes, only represent the networks for the question

srv2 is on 192.16.2.0 (network B, sw2)

If A wants sends out traffic for B via sw1 (the one A is physically connected to) and ip routing is turned on on the switches, sw1 & sw2, do I need a specific gateway for the sw2 traffic?

Let me ask another way,

  • If svr1 send traffic to svr2 and I only have one physical network connection to to sw1, what happens to the packet?
  • Will packet ever make it to the Cisco switch from the box?
  • Or does it get to the switch and die?
  • Get routed?
  • Isn't a unique gateway only need when you have more than one physical NIC?

I simplified the question, but in reality the sw2 subnet is on a private network along with many devices, specifically a SAN I want sw1 to be able to get to (and vice-versa).

1

You have to have routing set up correctly.

For example: SRV1 IP: 192.168.1.10/24 SRV2 IP: 192.168.2.10/24

SW-A IP: 192.168.1.1/24 SW-B IP: 192.168.2.1/24 (these you can set up as interface VLAN and switches should be interconnected)

In order for SRV1 to access SRV2, you should set the routing on SRV1 to:

192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.1.1

And on SRV2 (for reverse packet)

192.168.1.0/24 via 192.168.2.1

Hope it helps

  • So on the first server (.1), if I try to ping .2, I can't see it, but if I put a route in .1 to use switch1 for the .2 traffic, it will work, assuming if have IP Routing turned on in the switches? – johnny May 9 '16 at 15:05
  • yes, and switches should be connected to each other to pass this traffic – Denis Patlazhan May 9 '16 at 15:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.