I've read that you cannot boot from the VHD backups that Vista Ultimate / Server 2008 creates. However you can mount them with vhdmount.

So if you can't boot it then what good is the VHD backup over a regular compressed file backup and system restore?

2 Answers 2


Microsoft uses a technology called Volume Shadow Copy to make these backups. It's a very clever approach because it allows full volume sector-by-sector backups (like a Ghost image) that can be stored incrementally. If you backup every day, each additional copy only consumes the space required to store the changes, yet still looks like a full stand-alone image.

The combination of VHD (a convenient pre-existing disk image format) and Volume Shadow Copy makes it trivial to restore to any point in time (that you have a backup of).

Why are these image (or sector-based) backups useful?

1) Sector-based backups are orders of magnitude faster than file-based ones. In a sector-based backup the disk heads are moving sequentially whereas in a file-based backup the heads are moving randomly. In many cases this means the difference between backups being able to complete overnight or not.

2) You can do a complete system restore simply by booting from the Vista/Windows 7 DVD and going through the option of recovering your system. This covers scenarios like failed hardware or malware damaging your OS.

3) They are very space-efficient. Think of a 100 MB database file. If you do incremental file-based backups, every new backup will consume 100 MB. On the other hand, a sector-based incremental backup will only consume the space necessary to store the changes to the 100 MB file, which could be as small as a single sector.

Microsoft's use of the VHD format was a logical choice that saved them creating a new format -- a laudable approach in my opinion (the less "standards" the better). Think about it; with VHDMount I can now mount full-disk backups AND Virtual PC/Hyper-V virtual disks -- what's not to like? Nowhere in all that is the implication that an image of a computer will boot on completely different hardware (which is what Virtual PC/Hyper-V are equivalent to).

  • Thanks for the explanation. All of those are very solid reasons, I have to admit however that I was disappointed when I found that I couldn't simply run the VM from the VHD. It seems at the least I ought to be able to do a system restore to VirtualPC or different hardware. Is that possible? Nov 15, 2009 at 17:17

I think the idea behind it is that if using Hyper-V, you can quickly move it to another Hyper-V server and mount it to another Virtual server.

  • I can see how that would make sense in a enterprise environment with Server 2008 machines but why on Vista? Maybe it's just one of those things that Microsoft does that doesn't make sense. But I was hoping for something more convenient for the non-enterprise user. Oct 27, 2009 at 21:15
  • Looks like Windows 7 support booting these and mounting them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    – ITGuy24
    Oct 28, 2009 at 4:34
  • This works if you set it up that way from scratch but you cannot do this from a VHD produced from a backup of a physical machine. Mar 17, 2010 at 14:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.