1

I'm planning to offer a backup service with limited ssh access.

The best solution i've thought of so far would be to use chroot and allow access only to certain commands like: cd,mkdir,mv,rm,rsync,sftp etc, and mount the home directories as noexec.

I'm planning to do this on a centos 7 system.

Is there any way that a malicious customer could break out of the chroot system and invade other user's data or create other issues? Any other security considerations?

  • Have you considered an SFTP-only chroot jail? Assuming it's mainly just a backup service. – Parthian Shot Nov 16 '16 at 1:22
  • Yes, but i wanted to offer git and rsync as well. – VelDev Nov 16 '16 at 15:32
  • well, git is its own subsystem. And your users can use sshfs with sftp and then rsync from the mounted directory into other directories. That said, I don't know whether rsync is actually efficient in that scenario, or whether it just ends up being about the same level as scp. – Parthian Shot Nov 16 '16 at 23:04
0

I would suggest you take a look at unprivileged containers: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/getting-started/

Containers provide better isolation compared to a chroot jail. It still has low overhead. LXC uses minimal resources in terms of RAM and HDD space without the overhead of installing a guest OS in a virtual machine.

  • Thank you for the suggestion, i've been thinking that the lxc containers would provide much more functionality and risks compared to the limited shell option. – VelDev Nov 16 '16 at 15:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.