0

I am struggling to find an appropriate OID that will allow me to monitor the status of a port channels member mode status's.

We have several scenarios where equipment is connected to a MUX and the long haul fiber behind the MUX goes down (Interfaces on our gear do not go down). For non-aggregate interfaces I typically monitor to see if MAC addresses are being learned on the interface, however this will not work for a port channel.

We see this in logs on equipment we monitor detects a circuit issue:

ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_SUSPENDED

If anyone is aware of an OID (Or can confirm this type of monitoring is absolutely not possible with snmpwalks), I would be grateful.

EDIT: The particular piece of hardware I am monitoring is a Cisco Nexus, however we do have a variety of hardware from multiple vendors, so if there is a way to monitor this type of situation with standard MIB's (IEEE, IETF, RFC, etc).

0

You didn't specify a particular hardware platform you're trying to monitor, but by message format I believe this is Cisco.

With Cisco's you could get monitoring information for portchannels out of cisco-port-channel-mib and IEEE8023-LAG-MIB, depending on platform and software.

We also used to check channel integrity in old days by monitoring ifHighSpeed (that's old-school Cisco IF-MIB) for the port-channel, it changes when physical members are falling out of Po.

  • I've browsed IEEE8023-LAG-MIB, but do not see anything the member interface modes. I haven't seen anywhere where the member's are enumerated and what their mode is (suspended, operational, etc). The problem with ifHighSpeed is that while the member is up/up its HighSpeed will always be 1000. Though it is up/up, the port-channel marks it suspended due to issues beyond the member interface. – Michael Moser Dec 21 '16 at 20:52
  • Member interface modes encoded in this MIB in dot3adAggPortActorOperState within dot3adAggPortTable, they are encoded as 8bit binary values where each bit represents true/false for certain phases of LACP finite state machine. You should look into it and see if your topology issues trigger some changes there.. – Peter Zhabin Dec 21 '16 at 21:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.