0

I was changing a service from a disabled state to a running state with the startup type as automatic on a bunch of servers, and I was poking around online on how to do it remotely, and using Set-Service for the startup type worked remotely, but for some reason doing a Get-Service | Start-Service gave me an error. I found a site that said you needed to do a Set-Service -Status Running, and that worked, but does that actually start the service? Is there a difference between doing it that way and doing a Start-Service locally?

Here's my final command, because the site also gave me an idea of how to do a 1-liner:

Get-Service -ComputerName SERVER -Name "SERVICE*" | Set-Service -StartupType Automatic -PassThru | Set-Service -Status Running

I like that, but it seemed that services that take a couple seconds to start up with a Start-Service command are immediately set to running with the Set-Service command, meaning that maybe it's not actually starting the service.

I'm sure it's ok, but I'm paranoid and want to make sure.

4

The Start-Service cmdlet cannot be run against remote computers, so with your scenario, using Set-Service -Status Running is the only way to do accomplish your task. Yes, it is actually starting the services.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.