I updated a
FreeBSD box from
11.2-RELEASE-p4 recently and it seems to have broken the
vpnc VPN connectivity.
IPSec gateway 10.1.0.1 IPSec ID vpnuser IPSec secret su0hoh8liNgeiT8 Xauth username vpnuser Xauth password miuthei3Niew2ee Nat Traversal Mode none Noninteractive
Following the interface configuration; em0 is the hardware interface with private IP address, tun0 the vpnc's interface with a public address.
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC> inet 10.2.2.1 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.2.3.255 nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=21 groups: lo tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1412 options=80000<LINKSTATE> inet x.11.11.60 --> x.11.11.60 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=29 groups: tun Opened by PID 90343
So far I've found out:
vpnc can apparently get the VPN connection up, running vpnc with
--no-detachdoesn't show any critical errors. I am using the same config as before with the previous
FreeBSDversion where it worked flawlessly. I've also tried a few versions of
vpnc-scripts. I've also tested it with pf firewall rules flushed with
pfctl -F all.
pings sent from the local machine (
ping 220.127.116.11) do show in
tcpdump -ni tun0as outgoing traffic:
00:58:24.017976 IP x.11.11.60 > 18.104.22.168: ICMP echo request, id 42593, seq 4, length 64
pings sent from the local machine show in
tcpdump -ni em0; interesting is that the VPN packet seems to get a proper response each time and the response reaches the hardware interface of local machine:
00:58:24.018029 IP 10.2.2.1 > 10.1.0.1: ESP(spi=0x1bcc60be,seq=0x3c), length 132 00:58:24.078558 IP 10.1.0.1 > 10.2.2.1: ESP(spi=0xe48f7620,seq=0x6b), length 132
however, the returning packet doesn't show up in
ping packets from a random external (internet) host to x.11.11.60 do induce similar traffic which can be seen on
em0but not on
01:35:32.612015 IP 10.1.0.1 > 10.2.2.1: ESP(spi=0xe48f7620,seq=0x124), length 132
sysctl value of
net.inet.ip.forwarding doesn't seem to have any effect.
VPN (tun0) should be the host's default route out. Based on the finding that the example ping gets a response back til
em0 this doesn't seem to be a routing problem.
Can you spot something I'm missing? Any ideas how could I get the VPN connection working again?
UPDATE – New findings:
It now seems probable that this is not a
vpnc specific problem. Rather there might be something with ESP handling on
- I found a workaround to the problem which is simply to force the NAT traversal mode with
--natt-mode force-nattdespite there's no NAT between the hosts. For some reason there's no problem with encapsulated UDP:
What shows on
14:15:18.500251 IP 10.2.2.1.4500 > 10.1.0.1.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0x66842bb7,seq=0x3), length 132 14:15:18.527137 IP 10.1.0.1.4500 > 10.2.2.1.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0x3a4661f0,seq=0x3), length 132
... can be seen unencrypted now also on
14:15:18.500200 IP x.11.11.60 > 22.214.171.124: ICMP echo request, id 64016, seq 2, length 64 14:15:18.527188 IP 126.96.36.199 > x.11.11.60: ICMP echo reply, id 64016, seq 2, length 64
I set up a separate solution with
racoonusing FreeBSD manual and it showed similar behaviour when it comes to apparently not handling incoming ESP packets. For some reason I get now the error
vpnc: esp sendto: Invalid argumentwhen I try to ping if
vpncwas started with
Any help is still appreciated.