0

We do have a case where we would like to setup an Exchange distribution group (created using New-DistributionGroup with closed joining and leaving) in order to easily reach multiple teams. Adding users directly works just fine but using the security groups of those teams doesn't seem to work. The security groups are not mail enabled but each individual user object within the security group has a mailbox.

Would anyone happen to know if there is a way to make this work? It looks like distribution groups only check their direct members? Could it be because the distribution group is a universal group while the security groups are just global? I do know the revers doesn't work.

One question I came across mentioned this technet article citing the general definition of a distribution group as an answer but that doesn't answer the question.

2
  • 1
    No. There isn't any way to make this work. You need to add the individual members to the Distribution Group.
    – joeqwerty
    Dec 18, 2018 at 12:12
  • Thanks for your comment @joeqwerty if you want to turn it into an answer. I'll delete mine and accept yours. It's a shame there is no way around this.
    – Seth
    Dec 20, 2018 at 8:10

1 Answer 1

1

As joeqwerty commented it doesn't seem like this is possible. There is no direct documentation that states this, just various posts on questions regarding this topic.

The best answer I came across was on a technet forum post from Jason Chao:

Exchange depends on the group expansion logic for nested membership, which means that all the groups down the chain must be mail-enabled.

It's not actually a AD limitation. Running Get-ADGroupMember -Recursive on a distribution group is working perfectly fine. It's an Exchange limitation which only looks at group members that are mail enabled. So nesting mail enabled groups works. I haven't tried whenever just populating the E-Mail address field of a group might be enough.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .