I recently formatted a single disk from the line of new 14TB Seagates on Windows 10 with ReFS, with a 4K block size, to use the full capacity available and noticed that out of the approximately 12.7TB it presents as usable that it already reports that 100GB has been consumed.
I checked in disk manager and saw no additional partitions added (plus this would be space consumed within the same partition) and checked for hidden files, but turned up nothing. 100GB consumed for an empty disk seems a little surprising unless it is used for some kind of parity, but also I'm fairly new to using ReFS and don't know all its features.
I've noticed from Microsoft's documentation that ReFS offers something called "mirror-accelerated parity", but I am not using ReFS across two or more disks, but rather a standalone disk. Could the 100GB be reserved for parity or some other feature for preventing data corruption (also mentioned in the Microsoft documentation)? And would it matter if I chose an 8K block size instead?
Any thoughts on what could be using that space?
Here is some additional information I pulled about the drive from System Info:
Bytes/Sector: 512 Partitions: 1 Sectors/Track: 63 Tracks/Cylinder: 255 (Total Disk) Size: 12.73TB (14,000,512,296,960) Total Cylinders: 1,702,132 Total Sectors: 27,344,750,580 Partition: Disk #0,Partition #0 Partition Size: 12.73TB (14,000,383,328,256) Partition Starting Offset: 135,266,304 bytes
There is a delta in size between the Total Disk Size and the Partition Size of 122.99GB, but this does not match the now 101GB (seems like it grew by 1GB since I last looked at it) that is reported used. And again, the 101GB is reported as consumed within the partition itself.
The disk is still empty, though I did test creation of a .txt file and then delete it. If there is parity I wonder if creation of that file is what increased the utilization reported (after the fact), even though the file was deleted.
Additional reading on ReFS: - https://www.iperiusbackup.net/en/refs-vs-ntfs-differences-and-performance-comparison-when-to-use/