5

The GetPageSpeed repo has been hacked. Anyone with the repo installed will have malicious code installed on their box by yum update, including the file /etc/cron.d/sysstat2. I've notified GetPageSpeed, but it is 1am their time.

How do I warn people about this repo? Is there some way to warn anyone with the file /etc/cron.d/sysstat2 on their system that they have been compromised?

Specifics at CentOS 7 hacked and How did installing this RPM create a file?

As of 6/25/19, the malicious packages have been removed from the repo and new ones published that remove the cron job they installed.

  • 1
    Canonical made all recent Ubuntu installs phone home to fetch text snippets that are added to motd (displayed on logon). After inevitably more compromises of external / unsupported repositories happen, I expect this question to receive an additional answer that directs to the distro security teams to activate such mechanism. – anx Jun 25 at 3:14
2

There's no way to warn anyone with that file.. sorry.

If you are trying to reach other users of that repository directly, I would suggest looking at their website and see where other users may be active; mailing list, Twitter, Facebook. In this particular instance they have Twitter, Facebook, and GitHub.

It's a shame this wasn't known sooner. He was just active 3 hours ago.

  • I don't understand how I would warn anyone on that company's Twitter, Facebook, or GitHub pages. Don't they control what is posted there? – Pascal Jun 24 at 23:02
  • It may have been figured out in time, had my original question not been "marked as duplicate by Michael Hampton". Is it the policy of StackExchange not to assist with hacks? Seems to me that any time a server is hacked the entire community has a vested interest in figuring out how so that other servers don't get hacked the same way. – Pascal Jun 24 at 23:06
  • 3
    @Pascal I think you have to keep in mind what is actually possible to answer for other SE users. The "hacked" type of questions generally are either non-questions or questions that the community cannot answer as the solution tends to require a good amount of hands-on investigation to figure out. That's why pointing at the generically phrased question with good generic answers actually makes sense for the most part. If your intention was to post a specific solution on your own, I suggest that you add that as a comment on your closed question and I would think it can be reopened. – Håkan Lindqvist Jun 24 at 23:37
  • Pointing at helpful info is always good, I'm just not sure about closing a question as a duplicate when it clearly is not. – Pascal Jun 24 at 23:55
  • 2
    @Pascal You can visit Meta Server Fault if you have concerns about moderation. Keep in mind that while that malicious payload might say "its ok haha" right now, it could have been anything else at 7:07 am. You cannot know your system is not still compromised, and the only reasonable thing to do is to blow it away and rebuild it, which is why your question was marked as a duplicate. – Michael Hampton Jun 25 at 3:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.