2

I have a 2TB USB hard drive that I use as a backup disk. The disk contains a GPT partition table with one partition, type bf00. On that partition, I created a ZFS pool with encryption and compression enabled, and one single dataset.

While I rsyncing my files to the disk, I noticed that the total size of the mounted dataset got smaller and smaller (please note: this is the weird part, it really is the total size, not the available size). How can that be? And how can I use the full capacity?

This is the output of df -h, the total size is already down to 1.2T (rsync is still copying at the moment):

backup/DATA             1,2T    380G  834G   32% /backup

This is zpool list:

# zpool list
NAME        SIZE  ALLOC   FREE  CKPOINT  EXPANDSZ   FRAG    CAP  DEDUP    HEALTH  ALTROOT
backup     1,81T   964G   892G        -         -     3%    51%  1.01x    ONLINE  -

And this is zfs list:

# zfs list
NAME                     USED  AVAIL     REFER  MOUNTPOINT
backup                   973G   832G       98K  none
backup/DATA              381G   832G      381G  /backup

So it seems there is about one third of the capacity missing, how can that be? Can I reclaim the space somehow? And where did it go? I'm using Arch Linux (5.3.8-arch1-1) with zfs-dkms 0.8.2-1.

BTW: I'm not talking about the 2 TB vs 1.8 TebiByte issue, this is something else.

Update:

Here's the output of zpool status:

zpool status
  pool: backup
 state: ONLINE
  scan: none requested
config:

    NAME           STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    backup         ONLINE       0     0     0
      BackupDisk1  ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors

and

zfs list -o space
NAME                    AVAIL   USED  USEDSNAP  USEDDS  USEDREFRESERV  USEDCHILD
backup                   793G  1011G        0B     98K             0B      1011G
backup/DATA              793G   422G        0B    422G             0B         0B

Latest news:

Ok, I left the system to itself over night just to see what would happen. When I last looked, the figures were like above, the total space of the dataset backup/DATA was shrinking while copying some hundred GB onto it. And even when rsync finished, the drive was busy (as indicated by the LED). There was also a large background CPU usage.

When I took a look this morning, the total size of backup/DATA was back at 1.8TB and all background work has obiously finished. Tadaa! :-)

I think what might have happened is this: rsync was throwing a large amount of files at the dataset. ZFS seems to receive and kind of buffer the files that need to be written. This buffer probably shrinks the total usable size while it exists. As I have compression and encryption enabled on the pool resp. dataset, this may have taken a while (long after rsync finished), even on my quite decent workstation (12 cores, 32 GB RAM), perhaps because the USB drive really isn't fast.

Can somebody confirm that this (or something in that direction) is what happens? I think it would be good to know for everyone who runs into a similar issue.

  • 1
    Do you have any snapshot? Please show the output of zpool status and zfs list - t all; zfs list -o space – shodanshok Nov 3 '19 at 20:01
  • No, I did not create any snapshots. Please see my updated question. – Alex Nov 3 '19 at 20:07
3

You have ~600 GB referred by backup dataset only, with additional 422 GB referred by backup/data.

The approach used by zfs to "publish" the right amount of free space on a filesystem as seen by legacy utilities as df is to alter the total available disk space. While slightly confusing, it produce the correct amount of free space and it is way clearer than, say, what BTRFS does.

In your specific case, as you write on backup (rather than backup/data), the total available space for other dataset/filesystem is reduced accordingly.

EDIT: as the OP confirmed he really wrote nothing on backup, I offer and additional explanation. ZFS features as sort of "delete throttle", where deleted files are de-allocated in the background. As rsync creates and deletes many temporary files in a short time, it is possible that the deleted-but-not-already-deallocated files where counted against the root dataset backup (reducing the AVAIL for backup/data).

| improve this answer | |
  • Thanks for the explanation. I did not write anything to "backup" itself, just to backup/DATA that is mounted to /backup in linux. How can there be space used on the parent backup dataset? Can I reclaim it or somehow? Or do I just have to keep filling the child dataset and ZFS enlarges backup/DATA automatically? – Alex Nov 3 '19 at 21:43
  • Based on the output of zfs list, you did write something on backup. Please double-check and, if unsure, post the output of df and ls -al /backup – shodanshok Nov 4 '19 at 6:35
  • The explanation is correct, but I don't see where your numbers are coming from. The outputs shown are simply incomplete. backup is truly empty. – Daniel B Nov 4 '19 at 6:46
  • No, I definitely did not write anything to backup, I also made sure by mounting backup directly and taking a look. But I think I found the answer, please see my updated question. – Alex Nov 4 '19 at 9:03
  • @Robert I'up updated my answer with a possible explanation – shodanshok Nov 4 '19 at 11:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.